US District Court for the Eastern District of Oklahoma Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 41 - 50 of 1,985
Mendenhall v Seminole Nation
as 6:2023cv00418
Petitioner:
Stoney Ray Mendenhall
Counter Defendant:
Seminole Nation Tribal Court
Cause Of Action: 25 U.S.C. § 1303 Habeas Corpus - Indian Civil Rights Act (detention)
Hanson v. Davis
as 6:2023cv00414
Petitioner:
Michael S. Hanson
Respondent:
Kelli Davis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Churchill v. Clark
as 6:2023cv00412
Plaintiff:
Zechariah Michael Gilbert Chruchill and Zechariah Michael Gilbert Churchill
Defendant:
Bradley Clark
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Funk v. Rankins
as 6:2023cv00413
Petitioner:
Derek Funk
Respondent:
William Rankins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jaquez v. Cherokee County et al
as 6:2023cv00410
Plaintiff:
Henry Joseph Jaquez
Defendant:
Cherokee County, John Bennett, Haley Robison and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
David v. Hodges et al
as 6:2023cv00405
Defendant:
Angela Cacey, FNU Fisk, Dustin Hodges and others
Plaintiff:
Jerome Adrian David
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McCoy v. Sipes et al
as 6:2023cv00404
Plaintiff:
Jimmie McCoy, III
Defendant:
B Sipes, Lt. Lysinger, C.O. Musile and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kasper v. Atwood et al
as 6:2023cv00394
Plaintiff:
Nathan Robert Frank Kasper
Defendant:
Devra Atwood, Clay Linter, Jenny Saunders and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Butler v. State of Oklahoma
as 6:2023cv00396
Petitioner:
Joshua Duane Butler
Respondent:
State of Oklahoma
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Butler v. Rainbolt
as 6:2023cv00397
Plaintiff:
Joshua Duane Butler
Defendant:
Carmen Rainbolt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.