US District Court for the Northern District of Oklahoma Other Statutes Cases
Cases 161 - 170 of 348
Blackwell v. Blackwell
as 4:2011cv00328
Petitioner:
Sherri D Blackwell
Respondent:
Malcolm M Blackwell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Tranquility Hospice, L.L.C. v. Sebelius
as 4:2011cv00324
Plaintiff:
Tranquility Hospice, L.L.C.
Defendant:
Kathleen Sebelius
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395
Woffard v. Tulsa Adjustment Bureau, Inc.
as 4:2010cv00729
Plaintiff:
Cory Woffard
Defendant:
Tulsa Adjustment Bureau, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Slocum v. Corporate Express US Inc. et al
as 4:2010cv00650
Plaintiff:
Katherine R Slocum
Defendant:
Corporate Express US Inc. , Corporate Express Office Products Inc. , Cox Communications Central II, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Infinity Care of Tulsa v. Sebelius
as 4:2010cv00525
Plaintiff:
Infinity Care of Tulsa
Defendant:
Kathleen Sebelius
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
F.G.F. Co. et al v. Bank of America, N.A.
as 4:2010cv00512
Plaintiff:
F.G.F. Co. and Little Rock Tomato, Inc.
Defendant:
Bank of America, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Lindley v. Life Investors Insurance Company of America
as 4:2010cv00495
Plaintiff:
Denny Lindley
Defendant:
Life Investors Insurance Company of America
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Disan Engineering Corporation v. Landstar System, Inc. et al
as 4:2010cv00355
Plaintiff:
Disan Engineering Corporation
Defendant:
Landstar Ligon, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
United States Cellular Telephone of Greater Tulsa, L.L.C. v. Board of Adjustment of the City of Bixby, Oklahoma
as 4:2010cv00349
Plaintiff:
United States Cellular Telephone of Greater Tulsa, L.L.C.
Defendant:
Board of Adjustment of the City of Bixby, Oklahoma
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Leslie v. Fielden et al
as 4:2010cv00320
Plaintiff:
Carla Leslie
Defendant:
David D Fielden , Gary W Fielden and Karen R Fielden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
