US District Court for the Northern District of Oklahoma Prisoner Petitions Cases

General Cases, Dockets and Filings
Cases filed
Cases 21 - 30 of 1,172
Thompson v. State of Oklahoma
as 4:2023cv00442
Petitioner: Maurice Lajuan Thompson
Respondent: State of Oklahoma
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Boyce v. United States
as 4:2023cv00424
Petitioner: Jennifer Boyce
Respondent: United States
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
White v. Dowling
as 4:2023cv00423
Petitioner: Steve A White
Respondent: Janet Dowling
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Sims v. Sweat
as 4:2023cv00417
Petitioner: Shayna Lauren Sims
Respondent: Christe Sweat
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jackson v. United States Marshals Service
as 4:2023cv00413
Petitioner: Jesse Michael Wayne Jackson
Respondent: US Marshals Service and United States Marshals Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Foy v. Drummond et al
as 4:2023cv00407
Petitioner: Clint Patrick Foy
Respondent: Gentner Drummond and Steven Kunzweiler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Cato v. Bridges
as 4:2023cv00387
Petitioner: Timothy Shawn Cato
Respondent: Carrie Bridges
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Nunley v. Harpe
as 4:2023cv00380
Petitioner: Eugene Todd Nunley
Respondent: Steven Harpe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Weidenfelder v. White
as 4:2023cv00369
Petitioner: Sonia R Weidenfelder
Defendant: Tamika White
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Wanjiku v. Boggess
as 4:2023cv00363
Petitioner: Erick Wanjiku
Respondent: Gary Boggess and Gentner F Drummond
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?