US District Court for the Western District of Oklahoma Civil Rights Cases
Cases 81 - 90 of 1,676
Terry Ashton v. Oklahoma Department of Human Services et al
as 5:2023cv00575
Plaintiff:
Terry Ashton
Defendant:
Oklahoma Department of Human Services and Oklahoma Health Care Authority
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Account Receivable
Cosby v. Watonga City of et al
as 5:2023cv00550
Plaintiff:
Julia Barbara Cosby
Defendant:
Watonga City of, William Shawn Kays, Anitra Harper and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Mitchell v. Harwell et al
as 5:2023cv00534
Plaintiff:
Charles Eugene Mitchell, III
Defendant:
Capt Scott Harwell, John Doe and Michael Klika
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Earth Research Labs LLC et al v. Oklahoma State of
as 5:2023cv00520
Plaintiff:
Earth Research Labs LLC and Rodney Alexander Topkov
Defendant:
Oklahoma State of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Johnson v. Harris et al
as 5:2023cv00513
Plaintiff:
Amy Nicole Johnson
Defendant:
Jason Harris, Nick Crauthers, Leslie Shelton-Denley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Cox v. McCarthy
as 5:2023cv00502
Plaintiff:
Yasin Cox
Defendant:
Randall K McCarthy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Doe v. Oklahoma State of et al
as 5:2023cv00495
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe
Defendant:
Oklahoma State of and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
L Rothschild Express Trust v. Washington State of
as 5:2023cv00465
Respondent:
Washington State of
Claimant:
L Rothschild Express Trust and Dominick Wernicke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Sam v. BancFirst et al
as 5:2023cv00452
Plaintiff:
Ellijah Sam
Defendant:
BancFirst and Brian W Pierson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Royal v. Jones et al
as 5:2023cv00431
Plaintiff:
Tony Royal
Defendant:
Eric Jones and U-Stor Self Storage
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
