US District Court for the Western District of Oklahoma Prisoner Petitions Cases

Cases filed
Cases 1 - 10 of 6,200
Pollard v. Gonzales
as 5:2023cv01103
Petitioner: Clyde Pollard
Respondent: Abel Gonzales
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Hunter v. State of Oklahoma
as 5:2023cv01096
Petitioner: Henry Lee Hunter
Respondent: State of Oklahoma
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Morgan v. Biden
as 5:2023cv01097
Petitioner: David Brian Morgan
Respondent: Joe Biden
Serpik v. Manning et al
as 5:2023cv01093
Plaintiff: Roman Vladimirovich Serpik
Defendant: Derek Manning, Jeff Miller, FNU Murphey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kelly v. Stephens County Jail et al
as 5:2023cv01094
Plaintiff: Jacob Kelly
Defendant: Stephens County Jail, Heather LNU, Sean LNU and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Berry v. United States of America
as 5:2023cv01089
Respondent: United States of America
Petitioner: Steven DeWayne Berry
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Arrington v. Bureau of Prisons
as 5:2023cv01087
Petitioner: Derrek E Arrington
Respondent: Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Pittman v. Miller
as 5:2023cv01086
Petitioner: Jeremiah Christain Pittman
Respondent: Warden Miller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Fields v. United States of America
as 5:2023cv01090
Respondent: United States of America
Petitioner: Leonidas Roy Fields
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Hendricks v. Oklahoma State of
as 5:2023cv01078
Petitioner: Allen Ray Hendricks
Respondent: Oklahoma State of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?