US District Court for the Western District of Oklahoma
Cases 11 - 20 of 27,846
Bruce v. Wal-Mart Stores East LP
as 5:2024cv00383
Plaintiff:
Joni Bruce
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores East LP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Williams v. Wal-Mart Stores East LP
as 5:2024cv00384
Plaintiff:
Karlena Williams
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores East LP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00381
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00382
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Easley v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration et al
as 5:2024cv00387
Plaintiff:
Joseph F Easley
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line Company LP v. Isaac et al
as 5:2024cv00380
Defendant:
Phillips Gas Company, Harold Isaac, Karen Isaac and others
Plaintiff:
Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line Company LP
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717 Natural Gas Act
Hatcher v. Yang et al
as 5:2024cv00377
Plaintiff:
Robert L Hatcher
Defendant:
Sylvain Yang and Travis Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Fair Housing Act
Majoue et al v. State Farm Fire and Casualty Company
as 5:2024cv00375
Defendant:
State Farm Fire and Casualty Company and State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
Plaintiff:
George Majoue and Alice Majoue
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
First Church of the Nazarene of Enid v. Church Mutual Insurance Company SI
as 5:2024cv00378
Plaintiff:
First Church of the Nazarene of Enid
Defendant:
Church Mutual Insurance Company SI
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
