Oklahoma Civil Rights Cases
Cases 41 - 50 of 3,699
Kandoll v. Fletcher Town of et al
as 5:2024cv00111
Plaintiff:
Chelsea J Kandoll
Defendant:
Fletcher Town of, Fletcher Police Department and Dustin Wilson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Simmons v. Edmond City of et al
as 5:2024cv00097
Plaintiff:
Glynn Simmons
Defendant:
Edmond City of, Anthony David Garrett, Oklahoma City City of and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Kemp v. Cox et al
as 5:2024cv00099
Plaintiff:
Nancy Elizabeth Kemp
Defendant:
Preston Cox, Tim Tipton and Department of Public Safety
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lietzke v. Birmingham City of et al
as 5:2024cv00091
Plaintiff:
Bill Lietzke
Defendant:
Birmingham City of and Patrick D Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lietzke v. Montgomery County of et al
as 5:2024cv00088
Plaintiff:
Bill Lietzke
Defendant:
Montgomery County of, Reese McKinney and DT Marshall
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lietzke v. Greyhound Lines Inc
as 5:2024cv00090
Plaintiff:
Bill Lietzke
Defendant:
Greyhound Lines Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Lietzke v. Montgomery City of et al
as 5:2024cv00092
Plaintiff:
Bill Lietzke
Defendant:
Montgomery City of and Kevin Murphy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lietzke v. Montgomery City of et al
as 5:2024cv00093
Plaintiff:
Bill Lietzke
Defendant:
Montgomery City of and Kevin Murphy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lietzke v. Montgomery City of et al
as 5:2024cv00094
Plaintiff:
Bill Lietzke
Defendant:
Montgomery City of and Kevin Murphy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lietzke v. Montgomery City of et al
as 5:2024cv00095
Plaintiff:
Bill Lietzke
Defendant:
Montgomery City of and Kevin Murphy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
