Oklahoma Civil Rights Cases
Cases 61 - 70 of 9,214
Winningham v. City of Broken Arrow, Oklahoma et al
as 4:2024cv00062
Plaintiff:
John W Winningham, Jr
Defendant:
City of Broken Arrow, Oklahoma, Lanny and Leon Rademacher
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00171
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Climpson v. Independent School District No. 1 of Tulsa County
as 4:2024cv00058
Defendant:
Independent School District No. 1 of Tulsa County and Tulsa Public Schools
Plaintiff:
Gwendolyn Climpson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00059
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Patterson v. CoreCivic, Inc. et al
as 6:2024cv00052
Plaintiff:
Carl Patterson
Defendant:
CoreCivic, Inc., Joseph Norwood, Connor Whitlock and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Oklahoma State of v. Corey Jackson corp.sole
as 5:2024cv00162
Plaintiff:
Oklahoma State of
Defendant:
Corey Jackson corp.sole doing business as Corey Jackson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Account Receivable
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00163
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
Henderson v. Officer Tharp et al
as 6:2024cv00053
Plaintiff:
Damon Henderson
Defendant:
Officer Tharp, Larry Crossland and Spiro, Town of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00144
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00140
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
