Oklahoma Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 11,513
Davis v. USA
as 5:2025cv00761
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
David John-Matthew Davis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Mims v. Rice
as 4:2025cv00344
Plaintiff:
James Dernest Mims, Jr
Defendant:
Alexis Rice
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Clark v. Corecivic, Inc. et al
as 4:2025cv00345
Plaintiff:
Dewayne Clark
Defendant:
Corecivic, Inc., Unknown Corecivic Employee and Unknown Corecivic Medical Staff
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Oklahoma Criminal Justice Authority
as 5:2025cv00756
Petitioner:
Anthony D Johnson
Respondent:
Oklahoma Criminal Justice Authority
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bennett v. Harpe et al
as 4:2025cv00346
Petitioner:
Byron Scott Bennett
Respondent:
Steven Harpe and Casey Hamilton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Schuttak v. Unknown Male and Female et al
as 6:2025cv00221
Plaintiff:
John Schuttak
Defendant:
Unknown Male and Female and Unknown Female
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Schuttak v. Payton et al
as 6:2025cv00222
Plaintiff:
John Schuttak
Defendant:
Judge Payton, Judge Haran, Judge Waters and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Schuttak v. Thorpe et al
as 6:2025cv00223
Plaintiff:
John Schuttak
Defendant:
Jack Thorpe and Unknown Female
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Schuttak v. Sequoyah County Sheriff's Department et al
as 6:2025cv00224
Plaintiff:
John Schuttak
Defendant:
Sequoyah County Sheriff's Department and Unknown Female
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
President v. Green
as 4:2025cv00329
Petitioner:
Christopher Lee President
Respondent:
Margaret Green
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
