Oklahoma Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 11,001
Hopper v. Tulsa County et al
as 4:2024cv00416
Defendant:
Amy Fletcher, J Fiorio, C Rose and others
Plaintiff:
Keith Dewane Hopper
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brown v. Sherry et al
as 5:2024cv00916
Defendant:
K Goldey, FNU Westbrooks and FNU Sherry
Plaintiff:
Frankie Joe Brown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Clark v. Oklahoma Pardon and Parole Board et al
as 5:2024cv00917
Defendant:
Honorable Richard A Miller, Kevin Buchanan, Trace Briggs and others
Plaintiff:
Herman T Clark
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McVicker v. Tuggle
as 6:2024cv00314
Respondent:
Terry Tuggle
Petitioner:
Keith Edward McVicker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Smith v. City of Eufaula, et al. et al
as 6:2024cv00315
Defendant:
City of Eufaula, et al., Trent Casinger and Timothy Bryan
Plaintiff:
Ervin Ray Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Kunzweiler
as 4:2024cv00411
Defendant:
Steve Kunzweiler
Plaintiff:
Ryan K Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Decker v. Chickasha City Police Department et al
as 5:2024cv00905
Defendant:
District Attorneys Office, Chickasha City Police Department and Unknown Officers
Plaintiff:
Isaac John Earl Decker, Sr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thornbrough v. DOC of the State of Oklahoma
as 5:2024cv00906
Plaintiff:
Matthew Elijah Thornbrough
Defendant:
DOC of the State of Oklahoma
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Damron v. Choctaw Nation
as 6:2024cv00313
Defendant:
Kara Bacon and Choctaw Nation
Plaintiff:
Damon Lee Damron
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Chesser v. Harpe
as 5:2024cv00891
Petitioner:
Brian Wayne Chesser
Respondent:
Steven Harpe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
