District of Oklahoma Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases filed
Cases 1 - 10 of 8,136
Jaquez v. Taylor et al
as 5:2018cv01032
Defendant:
P.D. Taylor, David Prater
Plaintiff:
Rudy Phil Jaquez
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Barrientez v. McCollum
as 5:2018cv01020
Respondent:
Tracy McCollum
Petitioner:
Lawrence L Barrientez
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Brooks v. Robinson et al
as 5:2018cv01014
Defendant:
Maria Robinson, Jimmy Martin, Shirley May
Plaintiff:
Alfred Brooks
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Carskadon et al v. Armor Correctional Health Services Inc et al
as 5:2018cv01013
Defendant:
Board of County Commissioners of Oklahoma County, Jerry Childs, Jr, John Whetsel
and others
Plaintiff:
Wendy Carskadon
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Harring v. USA
as 4:2018cv00527
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Joshua Harring
Cause Of Action: Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Arauz v. Farley et al
as 5:2018cv01011
Petitioner:
Erick Josue Arauz
Respondent:
FNU Farley, United States of America, Great Plains Correctional Facility
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Gage v. Rashidzada et al
as 5:2018cv01000
Defendant:
Sandeepkumar R Singh, James S Walker, Virginia Banks
and others
Plaintiff:
Denton William Gage
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Fishinghawk v. Bear et al
as 5:2018cv01002
Defendant:
Gale Joslin, Carl Bear, Mark Hermandez
and others
Plaintiff:
Evan C Fishinghawk
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Rucker v. Garfield County Detention Center et al
as 5:2018cv01001
Defendant:
Garfield County Sheriff's Department, Garfield County of, Garfield County Detention Center
Plaintiff:
Tyree Duron Rucker
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Strange v. State of Oklahoma
as 5:2018cv01006
Petitioner:
Robert Joe Strange
Respondent:
State of Oklahoma
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
