Oregon Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 21 - 30 of 49
Jackson v. Thomas
as 1:2010cv01189
Petitioner:
Robert T. Jackson
Defendant:
J. E. Thomas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Piatt v. Nooth et al
as 3:2010cv00932
Defendant:
Jamie Miller, Mark Nooth, L. Wilson and others
Plaintiff:
Brian Scott Piatt
Debtor:
F. Serrano
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Richards v. Williams
as 1:2010cv00924
Petitioner:
Matthew James Richards
Defendant:
Max Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Solis v. Hill
as 1:2010cv00925
Defendant:
Jean Hill
Petitioner:
Juan Carlos Solis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Edwards v. Gower et al
as 3:2010cv00861
Plaintiff:
Prince Emmanuel Edwards
Defendant:
Sgt. A. Fenicottero, Michael F. Gower, C.O. Marchbanks and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Allee v. Oregon Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2010cv00655
Plaintiff:
Donald Ernest Allee
Defendant:
Mr. Beaumont, Sr., Jane #1 Doe, Jane #2 Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Davidson v. Williams et al
as 3:2010cv00575
Plaintiff:
Lennie T. Davidson
Defendant:
A. Nelson, Counselor Ruffcorn, Schutts and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hieu v. Orr et al
as 3:2010cv00558
Defendant:
C. Chen, Dave Fischer, Dr. Joel Gregory and others
Plaintiff:
Truong Hieu
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lichtenberg v. United States of America
as 3:2010cv00478
Petitioner:
Andrew L. Lichtenberg
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dunbar v. Thomas
as 3:2010cv00243
:
Respondent:
J. E. Thomas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
