US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 181 - 190 of 3,302
WHITEN v. COMMON WEALTH et al
as 2:2022cv05214
Plaintiff:
DURELL WHITEN and DURELL WHITE
Defendant:
COMMON WEALTH, CHARLES HAYDEN, JUDGE ROBERT P COLEMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DAVIS v. UNITED STATES ARMY RECRUIT et al
as 2:2022cv05213
Plaintiff:
TYSHEED DAVIS
Defendant:
UNITED STATES ARMY RECRUIT, PENNSYLVANIA BAR INSURANCE FUND, PENNSYLVANIA BAR ASSOCIATION and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
RILEY v. DETECTIVE JOHN DOE et al
as 2:2022cv05187
Plaintiff:
LEROY RILEY
Defendant:
DETECTIVE JOHN DOE, DETECTIVE JANE DOE, PHILA POLICE DEPARTMENT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HARRIS v. COLE et al
as 5:2022cv05147
Plaintiff:
ROBERT HARRIS
Defendant:
AMY COLE, MOSES MARTINEZ, ERIC S. PENNYPACKER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
NATIVIDAD v. RALEY et al
as 2:2022cv05061
Plaintiff:
RICARDO NATIVIDAD
Defendant:
DETECTIVE PAUL RALEY, DETECTIVE JAMES DOUGHERTY, DETECTIVE ARTHUR MEE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
TALLEY v. SHAPIRO et al
as 2:2022cv05018
Plaintiff:
QUINTEZ TALLEY
Defendant:
JOSH SHAPIRO, ATTORNEY GENERAL'S OFFICE, KEVIN BRADFORD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
TALLEY v. SHAPIRO et al
as 2:2022cv05019
Plaintiff:
QUINTEZ TALLEY
Defendant:
JOSH SHAPIRO, KEVIN BRADFORD, ATTORNEY GENERAL'S OFFICE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SANABRIA v. ENCARNACION
as 5:2022cv04976
Plaintiff:
ISRAEL SANABRIA
Defendant:
SAMUEL ENCARNACION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
IN RE: EUGENE SMITH
as 2:2022cv04974
Plaintiff:
EUGENE SMITH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
IN RE: DONNELLY
as 2:2022cv04928
Plaintiff:
IN RE: PATRICK DONNELLY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
