U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania Labor Cases
Cases 111 - 120 of 173
Dutko v. Franklin County et al
as 1:2011cv00299
Plaintiff:
Susan Dutko
Defendant:
Franklin County , John Hart and David Donohue
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2611
Dubiac v. Borough of Moosic et al
as 3:2011cv00201
Plaintiff:
Edward N. Dubiac
Defendant:
Borough of Moosic and Borough of Moosic Police Department
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
Solis v. Shingara
as 4:2011cv00178
Plaintiff:
Hilda L. Solis
Defendant:
Robert Shingara
Cause Of Action: 30 U.S.C. § 0801
Keeler v. Fromm Electric Supply Corporation
as 3:2010cv02628
Plaintiff:
Thomas Keeler
Defendant:
Fromm Electric Supply Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Yermal v. Shinseki
as 3:2010cv02592
Plaintiff:
Marilouise Yermal
Defendant:
Eric K. Shinseki
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Jones v. Pinnacle Health System et al
as 1:2010cv02319
Plaintiff:
Dawn Jones
Defendant:
Pinnacle Health System, Monica Stewart, Patrice Taleff and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2611
Diehl v. Carolina Supply Chain Services LLC et al
as 1:2010cv02081
Plaintiff:
Sharon Diehl
Defendant:
Carolina Supply Chain Services LLC, CLS Reverse Logistics, Mike Cruey and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2611
Leathers v. Compassionate Care Hospice, Inc. et al
as 1:2010cv02078
Plaintiff:
Francene M. Leathers
Defendant:
Compassionate Care Hospice, Inc., Pat Heiland, Michelle Gehyo and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Purdue v. Hillcrest Retirement Community, Inc. et al
as 3:2010cv01969
Plaintiff:
Dawn Purdue
Defendant:
Hillcrest Retirement Community, Inc., Jody Lutkins and Tami Swain
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2611
Fisher v. Rite Aid Corporation et al

as 1:2010cv01865
Plaintiff:
James Fisher
Defendant:
Rite Aid Corporation and Eckerd Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.