US District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania Labor Cases
Cases 41 - 50 of 165
Acosta v. Local 1940, United Steel Workers International Union
as 1:2018cv02124
Plaintiff:
R. Alexander Acosta
Defendant:
Local 1940, United Steel Workers International Union
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0401
Knapp v. Consulate Health Care
as 3:2018cv01941
Defendant:
Consulate Health Care
Plaintiff:
Wilma Knapp
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Patterson v. Amazon et al
as 1:2018cv01482
Plaintiff:
Charlie Patterson
Defendant:
Supervisor Jealene, Amazon and Supervisor John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
INTRA-NATIONAL HOME CARE, LLC v. DHUNGANA
as 1:2018cv00990
Plaintiff:
Intra-National Home Care, LLC
Defendant:
Tika Dhungana
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1836
McCuen v. Maines Paper & Food Service, Inc.
as 3:2018cv00902
Plaintiff:
Michael McCuen
Defendant:
Maines Paper & Food Service, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Schaech v. IAAS Worldwide, LLC et al
as 1:2018cv00724
Plaintiff:
Laura Schaech
Defendant:
IAAS Worldwide, LLC and Alan David Loeser, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201
Pierre et al v. Integrity Staffing Solution
as 1:2018cv00561
Plaintiff:
Edrice Pierre and Edwin Pierre
Defendant:
Integrity Staffing Solution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Taylor v. Pennsylvania Higher Education Assistance Agency/AES et al
as 1:2017cv02407
Plaintiff:
June K. Taylor
Defendant:
Pennsylvania Higher Education Assistance Agency/AES, Brett W. Schreyer, Earl Hoch and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Clowney v. URS/AECOM, URS Federal Services et al
as 3:2017cv01761
Plaintiff:
Sandra Clowney
Defendant:
URS/AECOM, URS Federal Services and I.A.M. International Association of Machinists & Aerospace Workers, District 1 and Local 1717
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185
Acosta v. Susquehanna Nuclear LLC,
as 3:2017cv01752
Plaintiff:
R. Alexander Acosta
Defendant:
Susquehanna Nuclear LLC,
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 651
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
