US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania Torts - Injury Cases
Cases 81 - 90 of 123
KRANEK v. AMERICAN ELECTRIC POWER COMPANY, INC. et al
as 2:2009cv00963
Plaintiff:
CHRISTIAN KRANEK and CHRISTIAN KRANEK
Defendant:
AMERICAN ELECTRIC POWER COMPANY, INC., AEP RIVER OPERATIONS, LLC, AEP MEMCO, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
VALENTINE v. C&C MARINE MAINTENANCE COMPANY
as 2:2009cv00637
Plaintiff:
CHESTER VALENTINE
Defendant:
C&C MARINE MAINTENANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688 Jones Act
CARRIER v. CONSOL ENERGY RIVER OPERATIONS
as 2:2009cv00578
Plaintiff:
JIMMIE L. CARRIER
Defendant:
CONSOL ENERGY RIVER OPERATIONS
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688 Jones Act
BRACKENBURY v. CAMPBELL TRANSPORATION COMPANY, INC.
as 2:2009cv00440
Plaintiff:
GARY BRACKENBURY
Defendant:
CAMPBELL TRANSPORATION COMPANY, INC.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
GASKY et al v. INGRAM BARGE COMPANY et al
as 2:2008cv01296
Plaintiff:
RUSSELL D. GASKY, RUSSELL D. GASKY, BRENDA A. GASKY and others
Defendant:
INGRAM BARGE COMPANY and INGRAM BARGE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
BUZZARD v. C&C MARINE MAINTENANCE COMPANY
as 2:2008cv00922
Plaintiff:
ROBERT BUZZARD
Defendant:
C&C MARINE MAINTENANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688 Jones Act
DAVIN v. CAMPBELL TRANSPORTATION COMPANY
as 2:2008cv00601
Plaintiff:
WAYLON E. DAVIN
Defendant:
CAMPBELL TRANSPORTATION COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688 General Admiralty and Maritime Law
MARTIN v. MATT CANESTRALE CONTRACTING, INC.
as 2:2008cv00303
Plaintiff:
DIANE M. MARTIN
Defendant:
MATT CANESTRALE CONTRACTING, INC.
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688 Jones Act
BERGEY v. KEY LAKES, INC.
as 1:2008cv00050
Plaintiff:
MELVIN J. BERGEY
Defendant:
KEY LAKES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688 General Admiralty and Maritime Law
BARLEY v. IMPERIAL TOWING, INC
as 2:2007cv01547
Plaintiff:
RALPH BARLEY
Defendant:
IMPERIAL TOWING, INC
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688 Jones Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.