US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania Torts - Injury Cases
Cases 31 - 40 of 59
MULAWKA v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 2:2011cv01651
Plaintiff:
MARZENA MULAWKA
Defendant:
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, MERCER COUNTY PENNSYLVANIA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SMOUSE v. GENERAL MOTORS COMPANY
as 2:2011cv01456
Plaintiff:
SANDRA SMOUSE
Defendant:
GENERAL MOTORS COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
STAUDT v. SHOWA BEST GLOVE, INC.
as 2:2011cv01239
Plaintiff:
DAVID STAUDT
Defendant:
SHOWA BEST GLOVE, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
LANDER v. GENERAL MOTORS, LLC
as 2:2011cv00673
Plaintiff:
LISA LANDER
Defendant:
GENERAL MOTORS, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
RUANE v. HONDA NORTH AMERICA, INC.
as 2:2010cv01113
Plaintiff:
EDWARD J. RUANE
Defendant:
HONDA NORTH AMERICA, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DOLFI v. ZOLL MEDICAL CORPORATION
as 2:2010cv01017
Plaintiff:
DOROTHY DOLFI
Defendant:
ZOLL MEDICAL CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
GEDID v. TOYOTA MOTOR CORPORATION et al
as 2:2010cv00407
Plaintiff:
MITCHELL P. GEDID
Defendant:
TOYOTA MOTOR CORPORATION, TOYOTA MOTOR SALES, U.S.A., INC. and TOYOTA MOTOR ENGINEERING & MANUFACTURING NORTH AMERICA, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Motor Vehicle Product Liability
JARVIE et al v. MORGAN CONSTRUCTION COMPANY
as 2:2009cv01503
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH JARVIE and AMY JARVIE
Defendant:
MORGAN CONSTRUCTION COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
MOTOMURA et al v. SINGH et al
as 2:2009cv01230
Plaintiff:
AKIKO MOTOMURA, AKIKO MOTOMURA, ERIC SAUNDERS and others
Defendant:
SUKVINDHE SINGH, SUKVINDHE SINGH, P.S. TRUCKING SERVICES, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Product Liability
ELICK v. FORD MOTOR COMPANY
as 2:2008cv01700
Plaintiff:
CHRISTINE ELICK
Defendant:
FORD MOTOR COMPANY
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
