District of Pennsylvania Prisoner Petitions Cases

Cases filed


Cases 1 - 10 of 7,738
WEBER v. HARPER
as 2:2017cv00216
Plaintiff: DALE J. WEBER
Defendant: WARDEN ORLANDO HARPER
Cause Of Action: pr Prisoner Civil Rights
KOKINDA v. PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2017cv00217
Plaintiff: JASON KOKINDA
Defendant: PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, PILLAI, CHRISTOPHER H. OPPMAN and others
Cause Of Action: pr Prisoner Civil Rights
EDWARDS v. DOC HOUTZDALE et al
as 3:2017cv00024
Plaintiff: JAMES EDWARDS
Defendant: DOC HOUTZDALE, JOYNER, SHERYL
Cause Of Action: pr Prisoner Civil Rights
BUILES v. KUTA
as 3:2017cv00023
Petitioner: LUIS BUILES
Respondent: S. M. KUTA
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
CRAWFORD v. PUBLIC DEFENDERS OFFICE et al
as 1:2017cv00045
Plaintiff: TONY CRAWFORD
Defendant: PUBLIC DEFENDERS OFFICE, KEVIN KALLENBACH
Cause Of Action: Civil Rights Act
RAMBERT v. OVERMYER et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2017cv00042
Petitioner: ERIC X. RAMBERT
Respondent: MICHAEL OVERMYER, BOARD OF PROBATION & PAROLE, JOHN N. DEITRICT and others
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
LAWSON v. OVERMYER et al
as 1:2017cv00038
Plaintiff: TYREE LAWSON
Defendant: MICHAEL OVERMYER, BLOSS, WOLFGANG and others
Cause Of Action: pr Prisoner Civil Rights
ALEXANDER v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 2:2017cv00204
Petitioner: DURAND ALEXANDER
Respondent: COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
DOMINGUEZ-RAMIREZ v. KUTA
as 3:2017cv00019
Petitioner: RAFAEL DOMINGUEZ-RAMIREZ
Respondent: S. M. KUTA
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
HAYES v. TICE et al
as 2:2017cv00198
Petitioner: DAVON RENEE HAYES
Respondent: ERIC TICE, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?