District Court Cases in Pennsylvania
Cases 1 - 10 of 419,204
BOGNAR v. ENCOMPASS HOME AND AUTO INSURANCE COMPANY
as 2:2023cv01677
Plaintiff:
MITCHELL BOGNAR
Defendant:
ENCOMPASS HOME AND AUTO INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
BREHM v. JOHNSTOWN POLICE DEPARTMENT
as 3:2023cv00229
Plaintiff:
ALEXANDER SHANE BREHM
Defendant:
JOHNSTOWN POLICE DEPARTMENT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv01676
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
PICONE v. USA
as 2:2023cv01681
Petitioner:
ADAM ROBERT LEE PICONE
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
REED v. HARTFORD LIFE AND ACCIDENT INSURANCE COMPANY
as 3:2023cv00227
Plaintiff:
JOHN REED, JR.
Defendant:
HARTFORD LIFE AND ACCIDENT INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Martinez v. Tony & Sons Auto Repair
as 1:2023cv01568
Plaintiff:
Alba Martinez
Defendant:
Tony & Sons Auto Repair
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Hertzog v. Mt. Carmel Township et al
as 4:2023cv01572
Plaintiff:
Carol Ann Hertzog
Defendant:
Mt. Carmel Township and Bryan Polifka
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01570
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act of 1990
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv01575
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Jackson v. Direct Building Supplies LLC
as 4:2023cv01569
Plaintiff:
Gerard Jackson
Defendant:
Direct Building Supplies, LLC doing business as ReNu Solar
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
