Pennsylvania Contract Cases
Cases 41 - 50 of 106
TAKEDA PHARMACEUTICALS U.S.A., INC. v. SPIRIDON SPIREAS
as 2:2017cv00452
Plaintiff:
TAKEDA PHARMACEUTICALS U.S.A., INC.
Defendant:
SPIRIDON SPIREAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
COMPLETE BUSINESS SOLUTIONS GROUP, INC. v. KANSAS CITY PEDIATRICS, LLC et al
as 2:2017cv00316
Plaintiff:
COMPLETE BUSINESS SOLUTIONS GROUP, INC.
Defendant:
KANSAS CITY PEDIATRICS, LLC and FREDERICK DATTEL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
KONINKLIJKE PHILIPS N.V. v. SANDERS FAMILY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP et al
as 2:2017cv00055
Plaintiff:
KONINKLIJKE PHILIPS N.V.
Defendant:
SANDERS FAMILY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP and MARK H. SANDERS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
CONTINENTAL CASUALTY COMPANY v. LAMARCA
as 2:2016cv01053
Plaintiff:
CONTINENTAL CASUALTY COMPANY
Defendant:
MICHAEL LAMARCA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BUNTING GRAPHICS, INC. v. GSA/PBS/NCR OFFICE OF ACQUISITION
as 2:2016cv00980
Defendant:
GSA/PBS/NCR OFFICE OF ACQUISITION
Plaintiff:
BUNTING GRAPHICS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
RIVERS EDGE, LLC et al v. MCGREEVY et al
as 2:2016cv01816
Plaintiff:
RIVERS EDGE, LLC and OAK ASSOCIATES, LLC
Defendant:
MARK G. MCGREEVY, DANIEL B. MCGREEVY, CALDERA BIG TUPPER, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
KWONG et al v. SIA
as 2:2015cv01028
Plaintiff:
LOW TUCK KWONG and GRANITO LIMITED
Defendant:
SUKAMATO SIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
THOMAS v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2015cv03422
Plaintiff:
MILTON THOMAS , SR.
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, THE SCHOOL DISTRICT OF PHILADELPHIA and WILLIAM MILLER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
BEEGHLEY v. BEEGHLEY et al
as 2:2015cv02635
Plaintiff:
BARBARA BEEGHLEY
Defendant:
JOHN L. BEEGHLEY and LAURA BEEGHLEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Aggrey-Dagbo v. Dagbo
as 3:2015cv00689
Plaintiff:
Felicia E Aggrey-Dagbo
Defendant:
Lotchi Dagbo
Cause Of Action: 27 U.S.C. § 185
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
