Pennsylvania Intellectual Property Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 1,074
DIGIMEDIA TECH, LLC v. SERVICE ELECTRIC CABLEVISION, INC.
as 5:2023cv03541
Plaintiff:
DIGIMEDIA TECH, LLC
Defendant:
SERVICE ELECTRIC CABLEVISION, INC.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
PEARL MUSICAL INSTRUMENT COMPANY CO. LTD v. HOSHINO GAKKI CO., LTD. et al
as 2:2023cv03220
Lead Plaintiff:
PEARL MUSICAL INSTRUMENT COMPANY CO. LTD
Defendant:
Hoshino Gakki Co., Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145 Patent Infringement
Multimodal LLC v. Fortune Brands Innovations, Inc.
as 2:2023cv02509
Plaintiff:
Multimodal LLC
Defendant:
Fortune Brands Innovations, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 183 Patent Infringement
BREEO LLC v. YARDCRAFT LLC et al
as 2:2023cv01801
Plaintiff:
BREEO LLC
Defendant:
YARDCRAFT LLC and URBAN FIRE LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126 Patent Infringement
BREEO LLC v. YARDCRAFT LLC et al
as 5:2023cv01801
Plaintiff:
BREEO LLC
Defendant:
YARDCRAFT LLC and URBAN FIRE LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126 Patent Infringement
Ningbo Futai Electric Limited v. QVC, Inc.
as 2:2023cv01768
Counter Defendant:
Ningbo Futai Electric Limited
Defendant:
QVC INC
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
I4F LICENSING N.V. v. OLLIES BARGAIN OUTLET, INC.
as 2:2023cv00735
Plaintiff:
I4F LICENSING N.V.
Defendant:
OLLIES BARGAIN OUTLET, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2271 Federal Tort Claims Act
MAZUR v. KRAVITCH
as 2:2023cv00567
Plaintiff:
IVAN MAZUR
Defendant:
NICK C. KRAVITCH doing business as KRAVITCH MACHINE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
CEDAR LANE TECHNOLOGIES INC. v. EVENLITE, INC.
as 2:2023cv01272
Plaintiff:
CEDAR LANE TECHNOLOGIES INC.
Defendant:
EVENLITE, INC.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
BRIGHT CAPTURE LLC v. THE NEAT COMPANY, INC.
as 2:2023cv01254
Plaintiff:
BRIGHT CAPTURE LLC
Defendant:
THE NEAT COMPANY, INC.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
