Pennsylvania Real Property Cases
Cases 71 - 80 of 5,237
MASSIE v. MASSIE et al
as 2:2023cv02352
Plaintiff:
STEVYN BRIAN MASSIE, SR.
Defendant:
BRANDYN CALIEB MASSIE, STEVYN BRIAN MASSIE, JR., JANIS BENSTOCK and others
SHI v. MEYERS MANAGEMENT CO., INC.
as 2:2023cv01124
Plaintiff:
NAN SHI
Defendant:
MEYERS MANAGEMENT CO., INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Torts to Land
IN RE: THE ESTATE OF HELEN HARPER v. HARPER
as 2:2023cv02364
Plaintiff:
IN RE: THE ESTATE OF HELEN HARPER
Defendant:
ROBERT J. HARPER
SHI v. MEYERS MANAGEMENT CO., INC. et al
as 2:2023cv00920
Plaintiff:
NAN SHI
Defendant:
MEYERS MANAGEMENT CO., INC. and JUECONG HUANG
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Torts to Land
Fannie Mae v. PF Hillside Manor, LP
as 2:2023cv02024
Plaintiff:
Fannie Mae
Defendant:
PF Hillside Manor, LP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
335 Righters Ferry Road LP v. Minno & Wasko Architects and Planners, PC
as 2:2023cv01963
Plaintiff:
335 Righters Ferry Road LP
Defendant:
Minno & Wasko Architects and Planners, PC and Moore Consulting Engineers, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
KIBBUTZ 3 LLC v. MASSIAH
as 2:2023cv01948
Plaintiff:
KIBBUTZ 3 LLC
Defendant:
SHAWN MASSIAH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Property Ejectment
JOHNSON v. AT&T
as 2:2023cv00814
Plaintiff:
AARON ALEXANDER JOHNSON
Defendant:
AT&T
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
BRATTON v. AMMERMAN et al
as 3:2023cv00088
Plaintiff:
STACEY-LYNN BRATTON
Defendant:
FREDERIC JOSEPH AMMERMAN INDIVIDUAL CAPACITY doing business as FREDRIC J. AMMERMAM, MICHAEL CHURNER, MAURENE E. INLOW and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 191 Bank Foreclosure
THOMPSON v. THOMPSON et al
as 2:2023cv00766
Plaintiff:
LEROY THOMPSON, JR.
Defendant:
OLIVER DAVID THOMPSON and EDWARD P. THOMPSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
