Pennsylvania Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 21 - 30 of 240
JOHNSON v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2018cv01553
Petitioner:
MARCEL JOHNSON
Respondent:
JOHN E. WETZEL, ROBERT GILMORE, MARK GARMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Hicks v. Wetzel et al
as 1:2017cv01969
Petitioner:
Charles Ray Hicks
Respondent:
John E. Wetzel, Robert Gilmore, Mark Garman and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
YANDAMURI v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2017cv03798
Petitioner:
RAGHUNANDAN YANDAMURI
Respondent:
JOHN E. WETZEL, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF MONTGOMERY and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
MASON v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2017cv03759
Petitioner:
LENWOOD MASON
Respondent:
JOHN WETZEL, CYNTHIA LINK and STEVEN GLUNT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
SMYRNES v. GILMORE et al
as 2:2017cv00720
Petitioner:
RICKY SMYRNES
Respondent:
ROBERT GILMORE and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
HANEY v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2016cv01901
Petitioner:
PATRICK RAY HANEY
Respondent:
JOHN E. WETZEL, ROBERT GILMORE and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Woodard v. Wetzel et al
as 3:2016cv02262
Petitioner:
Aric S. Woodard
Respondent:
John E. Wetzel, Robert Gilmore, Mark Garman and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
SMITH v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2016cv05791
Petitioner:
WAYNE SMITH
Respondent:
JOHN E. WETZEL, ROBERT GILMORE and MARK GARMAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
MURPHY v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2016cv01456
Petitioner:
KEVIN LEE MURPHY
Respondent:
JOHN WETZEL, ROBERT GILMORE, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
CASH v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2016cv04320
Petitioner:
OMAR SHARIFF CASH
Respondent:
JOHN E. WETZEL, ROBERT GILMORE and MARK GARMAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
