Pennsylvania Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 31 - 40 of 10,807
GINDRAW v. SANFORD et al
as 3:2024cv00065
Plaintiff:
TAHMIR GINDRAW
Defendant:
LT. SANFORD and LT. HOUSTON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
KING v. WALKER et al
as 2:2024cv00484
Plaintiff:
SHAWN KING
Defendant:
SUPERINTENDENT TINA WALKER and MR. MATIYASIC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
HARRISON-EL v. BUCKS COUNTY CORR. FACILITY et al
as 2:2024cv01300
Plaintiff:
ALI A.I. HARRISON-EL
Defendant:
BUCKS COUNTY CORR. FACILITY, KELLY REED, SPRNTNDNT. MATILLUS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McDONALD v. MARSH et al
as 1:2024cv00091
Plaintiff:
JOHN MAURICE McDONALD
Defendant:
ROBERT MARSH, SUPERINTENDENT RANDY IRWIN, MAJOR DEAL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
LEWIS v. SCI FOREST et al
as 1:2024cv00090
Plaintiff:
SYLVESTER LEWIS
Defendant:
SCI FOREST, WELLPATH, NP Eleanor Dorrion and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
COTTON v. MCCAFFRY
as 2:2024cv01345
Plaintiff:
DURELL H. COTTON, JR.
Defendant:
MCCAFFRY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BATCHELOR v. SPAGNOLETTI et al
as 2:2024cv01258
Plaintiff:
STEFAN BATCHELOR
Defendant:
LIEUTENANT SPAGNOLETTI, SUPERINTENDENT J. TERRA, UNIT MANAGER S. GRADY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LEBRON v. EASON et al
as 2:2024cv01284
Plaintiff:
JOSE LEBRON
Defendant:
SUPERINTENDENT KENNETH EASON and JOHN DOE 1
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
IN RE: TUNSIL
as 2:2024cv01262
Plaintiff:
BARRETT S. TUNSIL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JAVIER GOMEZ v. COMMONWEALTH OF PA et al
as 2:2024cv01227
Defendant:
SCI CHESTER, CO3 LT. MR. POSADA, COMMONWEALTH OF PA and others
Plaintiff:
JAVIER GOMEZ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
