Pennsylvania Prisoner Petitions Cases

Cases filed


Cases 11 - 20 of 40,576
Hodge v. Doe (1) et al
as 3:2019cv01573
Defendant: John Doe (1), John Doe (6), Jane Doe (1) and others
Plaintiff: Carl Hodge
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
O'CONNOR v. TRATE
as 1:2019cv00264
Petitioner: ARIAN O'CONNOR
Respondent: WARDEN TRATE
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
FARROW v. ESTOCK et al
as 2:2019cv01162
Petitioner: MARQUIS FARROW
Respondent: ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA, LEE ESTOCK
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
SCHOFIELD v. NICHOLAS et al
as 2:2019cv04207
Respondent: THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF: PHILADELPHIA, WENDY NICHOLAS, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF: PENNSYLVANIA and others
Petitioner: JOYCE SCHOFIELD
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
RUTHERFORD v. USA
as 2:2019cv01161
Respondent: USA
Petitioner: ANTONIO RUTHERFORD
Cause Of Action: Motion to Vacate Sentence
AYRES v. PHILADELPHIA PRISON SYSTEM et al
as 2:2019cv04203
Defendant: PHILADELPHIA PRISON SYSTEM, PHILA. SHERRIF
Plaintiff: KELLY AYRES, JR.
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
SCHRUBY v. SIANNI et al
as 2:2019cv04206
Plaintiff: FREDERICK SCHRUBY, TEEF
Defendant: JOHN DOE #5, CLAYTON, JANE DOE NURSE #1 and others
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
MADDOX v. GILMORE et al
as 2:2019cv01163
Defendant: SUPERINTENDANT ROBERT GILMORE, C.O. GUMBERT, C.O. SAYLOR and others
Plaintiff: OMAR MADDOX
Cause Of Action: Civil Rights
Snook v. McGinley et al
as 1:2019cv01570
Respondent: Thomas McGinley, PA State Attorney General
Petitioner: Joshua Snook
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
FRAZIER v. TICE et al
as 2:2019cv04205
Respondent: THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA, SUPERINTENDENT ERIC TICE, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF NORTHUMBERLAND
Petitioner: RAMON A. FRAZIER
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?