Pennsylvania Labor Cases
Cases 21 - 30 of 693
Williams v. Axis Energy Services, LLC
as 4:2023cv01588
Plaintiff:
Michael Williams
Defendant:
Axis Energy Services, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
LAMONT v. KENCO ENGINEERING, INC
as 2:2023cv01680
Plaintiff:
CLIFF LAMONT
Defendant:
KENCO ENGINEERING, INC doing business as KENCO WEAR PARTS, INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Labor/Mgmnt. Relatio
Brooks v. NVK Logistrics, Inc.
as 1:2023cv01556
Plaintiff:
Danielle A. Brooks
Defendant:
NVK Logistics, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
PUGH v. VALMONT INDUSTRIES, INC.
as 2:2023cv01520
Plaintiff:
RONALD PUGH
Defendant:
VALMONT INDUSTRIES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Labor/Mgmnt. Relatio
WALRATH v. SELFRIDGE et al
as 2:2023cv03053
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL WALRATH
Defendant:
MELISSA SELFRIDGE, BRIAN COSGROVE and USA COIL AND AIR, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity - Stockholders Suits
SPADY v. ROSS STORES, INC.
as 2:2023cv03010
Plaintiff:
Rashiek Spady
Defendant:
ROSS STORES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
MUNIZ v. AMAZON.COM SERVICES, LLC
as 5:2023cv02768
Plaintiff:
BOBBY MUNIZ
Defendant:
AMAZON.COM SERVICES, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Castillo et al v. Saks & Company LLC et al
as 2:2023cv02699
Plaintiff:
Scarlet Castillo and Nelson Castillo
Defendant:
Saks & Company LLC, Saks.com LLC and Arrow Workforce Solutions, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal
JACKSON et al v. LOWE'S HOME CENTERS, LLC
as 2:2023cv02668
Plaintiff:
KAREEM JACKSON, NASIR SAMPSON and YOULANDA BOLDER
Defendant:
LOWE'S HOME CENTERS, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Torres v. Acme Markets, Inc.
as 1:2023cv01103
Plaintiff:
Ricardo Torres
Defendant:
Acme Markets, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185 Labor/Mgt. Relations (Contracts)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
