Rhode Island Other Statutes Cases
Cases 71 - 80 of 2,403
Lisi v. Burke et al
as 1:2022cv00262
Plaintiff:
John Lisi
Defendant:
Nicholas Burke, Lisa Burke, John Baffoni and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Baffoni v. Lisi
as 1:2022cv00261
Plaintiff:
John Baffoni
Defendant:
John Lisi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Chisholm Chisholm &Kilpatrick LTD v. McDonough
as 1:2022cv00257
Plaintiff:
Chisholm Chisholm &Kilpatrick LTD
Defendant:
Denis McDonough
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
Shamrock Home Loans, Inc. v. Handler
as 1:2022cv00243
Plaintiff:
Shamrock Home Loans, Inc.
Defendant:
Kaitlyn Handler
Laccinole v. MRS BPO, LLC
as 1:2022cv00232
Plaintiff:
Christopher Laccinole
Defendant:
MRS BPO, LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Laccinole v. MRS BPO, LLC et al
as 1:2022cv00233
Plaintiff:
Christopher Laccinole
Defendant:
MRS BPO, LLC, Saul Freedman and Jeffrey Freedman
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Laccinole v. MRS BPO, LLC et al
as 1:2022cv00234
Plaintiff:
Christopher Laccinole
Defendant:
MRS BPO, LLC, Saul Freedman and Jeffrey Freedman
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Laccinole v. Gulf Coast Collection Bureau et al
as 1:2022cv00223
Plaintiff:
Christopher Laccinole
Defendant:
Gulf Coast Collection Bureau, Jack Warren Brown, III and Marie S. Areskog
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Webster Bank, National Association v. Pompei-Smith
as 1:2022cv00194
Plaintiff:
Webster Bank, National Association
Defendant:
Judith Pompei-Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment
Velasquez v. U.S. Superior Court
as 1:2022cv00167
Plaintiff:
Diego Velasquez
Defendant:
U.S. Superior Court
Intervenor:
Jimmy Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
