Rhode Island Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 91 - 100 of 410
Sevegny v. Eleanor Slater Hospital, et al
as 1:2020cv00174
Defendant:
Eleanor Slater Hospital Legal Dept., Eleanor Slater Hospital and Eleanor Slater Hospital Patient Resources and Benefits
Plaintiff:
Bryan Sevegny
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fontes v. Lopez et al
as 1:2020cv00151
Defendant:
Lieutenant Atella, Mario Lopez, Deputy Warden Jeffery Aceto and others
Plaintiff:
Courtney Scott Fontes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Diaz v. Nicholson et al
as 1:2020cv00148
Plaintiff:
Samuel J. Diaz
Defendant:
Richard Raspallo, Travis Drappi, Laura Nicholson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Lake v. Coyne-Fague
as 1:2020cv00149
Respondent:
Particia Coyne-Fague, Patricia A. Coyne-Fague and Attorney General for the State of Rhode Island
Petitioner:
Adam Lake
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hicks-Hinson v. Rhode Island Department of Corrections
as 1:2020cv00141
Defendant:
Rhode Island Department of Corrections
Plaintiff:
Lorenzo Hicks-Hinson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Pennell v. Martin et al
as 1:2020cv00116
Defendant:
Daniel W Martin, Central Falls Detention Facility Corporation, Correctional Officer Carter and others
Plaintiff:
Brien Pennell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Sevegny v. Eleanor Slater Hospital
as 1:2020cv00101
Defendant:
Eleanor Slater Hospital
Plaintiff:
Bryan Sevegny
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Sevegny v. Eleanor Slater Hospital
as 1:2020cv00102
Defendant:
Eleanor Slater Hospital
Plaintiff:
Bryan Sevegny
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Rush v. Lt. Hayes
as 1:2020cv00098
Defendant:
Lt. Hayes
Plaintiff:
Preston Rush
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Diaz v. Nicholson et al
as 1:2020cv00088
Defendant:
John Doe, Richard Raspallo, Thomas Quick and others
Plaintiff:
Samuel Diaz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
