US District Court for the District of South Carolina
Cases 1 - 10 of 86,870
Davis-Saddler v. Foster
as 8:2024cv05155
Defendant:
Lee Foster
Plaintiff:
Alberta Davis-Saddler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 (a) Fed. Question: Real Property
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv05174
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Jenkins v. Charleston Water System
as 2:2024cv05165
Defendant:
Charleston Water System
Plaintiff:
Lorraine Jenkins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
McKnight v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.
as 4:2024cv05166
Defendant:
JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.
Plaintiff:
Joseph M McKnight, Jr
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Tuten v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
as 4:2023cv03106
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Rodriguez v. Warden
as 1:2024cv05142
Petitioner:
Pedro Lazaro Rodriguez
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Alford v. Fox et al
as 9:2024cv05138
Respondent:
Marcus Rhods, George Debusk Jr., William Rudderow and others
Petitioner:
Billly L. Alford
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (County)
McCoy v. Stephen et al
as 4:2024cv05139
Defendant:
Michael Stephen and Elizabeth Munnerlyn
Plaintiff:
Damiane McCoy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
McKnight v. National Credit Adjusters LLC
as 4:2024cv05140
Defendant:
National Credit Adjusters LLC
Plaintiff:
Joseph M McKnight, Jr
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Anderson Oil Company, Inc. et al v. Pops Mart Fuels, LLC
as 9:2024cv05153
Plaintiff:
Crossroads Convenience, LLC and Anderson Oil Company, Inc.
Defendant:
Pops Mart Fuels, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
