US District Court for the District of South Carolina Civil Rights Cases
Cases 51 - 60 of 8,630
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv01000
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003 Job Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00992
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12117 Americans with Disabilities Act
Breyan v. Wesfargo Bank
as 3:2024cv00984
Plaintiff:
Michael Breyan and Michael Anthony Breyan
Defendant:
Wesfargo Bank
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Breyan v. Bank of America
as 3:2024cv00980
Plaintiff:
Michael Breyan
Defendant:
Bank of America
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00957
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Olivier v. City of Spartanburg, South Carolina et al
as 7:2024cv00946
Plaintiff:
Gabriel Olivier
Defendant:
City of Spartanburg, South Carolina and Stephen McClure
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00947
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12117 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 9:2024cv00908
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
Smith v. Scarborough et al
as 2:2024cv00905
Plaintiff:
Carolyn Tolbert Smith
Defendant:
Judge Mikell Scarborough, Charles Tolbert, Keith L. Tolbert and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
American Civil Liberties Union Foundation of South Carolina v. Stirling
as 3:2024cv00906
Plaintiff:
American Civil Liberties Union Foundation of South Carolina
Defendant:
Bryan Stirling
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
