US District Court for the District of South Carolina Prisoner Petitions Cases

General Cases, Dockets and Filings
Cases filed
Cases 1 - 10 of 6,376
Rogers v. Dodkin
as 1:2022cv03348
Petitioner: Michael Anthony Rogers
Respondent: Warden George Dodkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bryant v. Warden
as 9:2022cv03321
Petitioner: Tamar Yaron Bryant
Respondent: Warden of Lee Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Marcus v. Warden Wallace
as 8:2022cv03282
Petitioner: Marcus Albinus Joseph
Respondent: Warden Wallace
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lounds v. Warden Charles Williams
as 2:2022cv03272
Petitioner: Anthony Maurice Lounds
Respondent: Warden Charles Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Peters v. Cohen
as 9:2022cv03275
Petitioner: Donald Eugene Peters
Respondent: Levern Cohen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Daniel v. Nelson
as 9:2022cv03285
Petitioner: Keith Daniel
Respondent: Kenneth Nelson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Cherfils v. Warden
as 8:2022cv03241
Petitioner: Francis Cherfils
Respondent: R.S. Dunbar, Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Freeman v. Arnold et al
as 9:2022cv03249
Petitioner: Fred Freeman
Respondent: Kelly B. Arnold, Office of Disciplinary Counsel, Deborah S. McKeown and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Grant v. State of South Carolina
as 4:2022cv03265
Petitioner: Gary L. Grant
Respondent: State of South Carolina
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Martin v. Nelson
as 4:2022cv03264
Petitioner: Ronnie Martin
Respondent: Kenneth Nelson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?