US District Court for the District of South Carolina Labor Cases
Cases 71 - 80 of 758
Beemer v. Clarendon County
as 2:2022cv01145
Plaintiff:
Abbey Beemer
Defendant:
Clarendon County
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Stumpf v. Ronco Specialized Systems, Inc.
as 2:2022cv01053
Plaintiff:
Thomas Stumpf
Defendant:
Ronco Specialized Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Craven v. Mad Fish SC LLC
as 2:2022cv00935
Plaintiff:
Donald Nicholas Craven
Defendant:
Mad Fish SC LLC and Xin Lin
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Craven v. FAMULARIS 002, LLC
as 2:2022cv00385
Plaintiff:
Donald Nicholas Craven
Defendant:
FAMULARIS 002, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Flemming v. Performance Chiropractic Inc et al
as 2:2022cv00253
Plaintiff:
Mary Nicole Flemming
Defendant:
Performance Chiropractic Inc and Joseph Miller
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Fox v. Gator-Strong LLC et al
as 4:2022cv00148
Plaintiff:
Kristopher Fox
Defendant:
Gator-Strong LLC and James Leone
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Burdick v. LuLus Myrtle Beach LLC et al
as 4:2022cv00123
Plaintiff:
Katie Burdick
Defendant:
LuLus Myrtle Beach LLC doing business as Lucy Buffetts LuLus doing business as LuLus North Myrtle Beach, Lucy Buffett, George Martin and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 206
Wilkes v. McLeod Healthcare Network LLC
as 4:2022cv00061
Plaintiff:
Maya Wilkes
Defendant:
McLeod Healthcare Network LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Anderson v. Nason Care LLC et al
as 2:2021cv04132
Plaintiff:
Wendy Anderson
Defendant:
Nason Care LLC and Barron S. Nason
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Highers v. BriteLife Recovery at Hilton Head, LLC et al
as 9:2021cv03860
Plaintiff:
Jessika Highers
Defendant:
BriteLife Recovery at Hilton Head, LLC and Dennis Koleda
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
