South Carolina Civil Rights Cases
Cases 81 - 90 of 8,632
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 9:2024cv00527
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Age)
Woods v. S.C. Department of Social Services et al
as 6:2024cv00502
Plaintiff:
Anthony Woods
Defendant:
S.C. Department of Social Services, Child Support Enforcement and Cintas Headquarters
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Washburn et al v. Blackville Police Department et al
as 1:2024cv00511
Plaintiff:
Joshua Washburn, Ethan Hutson and Jackson Thompson
Defendant:
Town Hall (Blackville), Fonda Patrick, Ronnie Purnell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Worrick v. Hill et al
as 2:2024cv00415
Plaintiff:
Jedidiah Worrick
Defendant:
Rebecca Hill, Charles Turkle, Colleton County DSS Agency and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00420
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00425
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00384
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12117 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00323
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Age)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00334
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00332
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
