South Carolina Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 151 - 160 of 24,820
Padillas v. Bodiford
as 6:2024cv00902
Petitioner:
Roberto Padillas
Respondent:
Scotty Bodiford
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (County)
Gurley v. Oconee County Sheriff's Office et al
as 8:2024cv00899
Plaintiff:
Curtis Gurley
Defendant:
Oconee County Sheriff's Office, Office of Solicitor for the Tenth Judicial Circuit, Oconee County Clerk of Court and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Forrest v. United States of America
as 9:2024cv00901
Plaintiff:
Kevin Forrest
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Timmons v. Brantley
as 4:2024cv00916
Plaintiff:
Wondell Timmons, Jr.
Defendant:
Sgt Jonathan Lanord Brantley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr (Other)
Alford v. W. Glenn Campbell Detention Center et al
as 9:2024cv00914
Plaintiff:
Lashawn Alexander Alford
Defendant:
W. Glenn Campbell Detention Center, Allison Days and Lionel Martin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Timmons v. Turner
as 4:2024cv00915
Plaintiff:
Wondell Timmons, Jr.
Defendant:
Justin Turner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr (Other)
Reed v. Harvey
as 5:2024cv00903
Petitioner:
Lavern Justin Reed
Respondent:
Director Harvey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Reed v. Richland County
as 3:2024cv00904
Plaintiff:
Lavern Justin Reed
Defendant:
Richland County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Dyer v. USA
as 2:2024cv00942
Petitioner:
Cameron Dyer
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Branch v. Anderson County Detention Center et al
as 2:2024cv00851
Plaintiff:
Michael James Branch
Defendant:
Anderson County Detention Center, A.C.D.C. Medical Provider Staff, Chad McBride and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
