District of South Carolina Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases filed
Cases 41 - 50 of 19,433
Andrews v. SC-DSS et al
as 0:2018cv02631
Respondent:
Suzy T. Colins, David Hamilton, Bobbie V. Simms
and others
Petitioner:
Frederick J. Andrews
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Washington v. City of North Charleston et al
as 2:2018cv02627
Defendant:
Anthony Russ, North Charleston Police Department, John Glenn
and others
Plaintiff:
Amonee Washington
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Mixson v. Waid et al
as 0:2018cv02626
Defendant:
Randolph Waid, Alexander McDold, Micheal Cross
Plaintiff:
Daniel Mark Mixson
Cause Of Action: (Other)
Ware v. Horry County et al
as 4:2018cv02628
Petitioner:
Salvador Ware
Respondent:
Horry County, South Carolina Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Womble v. Williams et al
as 9:2018cv02625
Defendant:
Captain Katherine Tucker, Nurse Will Schultz, Laurens County Detention Center
and others
Plaintiff:
Johnny Earl Womble
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Hinton v. Williams
as 5:2018cv02617
Petitioner:
Matthew T Hinton
Respondent:
Randall Williams
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Outlaw v. State of South Carolina
as 1:2018cv02598
Respondent:
South Carolina, State of
Petitioner:
William Outlaw
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Fender v. USA
as 2:2018cv02594
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Travis Donald Fender
Cause Of Action: Motion to Vacate Sentence
Ladson v. Taylor
as 4:2018cv02597
Respondent:
Edwel T. Taylor
Petitioner:
Rodney L. Ladson
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Wazney v. State of South Carolina
as 6:2018cv02610
Respondent:
State of South Carolina
Petitioner:
Robert William Wazney
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
