South Carolina Prisoner Petitions Cases

Cases filed
Cases 61 - 70 of 20,678
Collier v. South Carolina, State of
as 5:2019cv03034
Plaintiff: Laquan Demetrius Collier
Defendant: South Carolina, State of
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Jones v. Antonelli et al
as 6:2019cv03036
Defendant: Jane Doe, T Graves, B M Antonelli and others
Plaintiff: Arthur Jones, Jr
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights, Federal Filers (Bivens)
Thomas v. Warden Phelps
as 2:2019cv03042
Petitioner: Vestal B Thomas
Respondent: Warden Phelps
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Brayint El v. Officer Fornandes et al
as 2:2019cv03045
Defendant: Sheriff Al Cannon, Officer Fornandes
Plaintiff: Bulus Kurnil Brayin El
Cause Of Action: (Other)
Burgess v. United States
as 8:2019cv03055
Petitioner: Charles Antoine Burgess, Charles A Burgess
Respondent: United States
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Rice v. Bragg
as 1:2019cv03054
Petitioner: William Delano Rice
Respondent: M Travis Bragg
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Thomas v. Warden Phelps
as 2:2019cv03044
Petitioner: Vestal B Thomas
Respondent: Warden Phelps
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (County)
Boyd v. Stonebreaker
as 1:2019cv03053
Petitioner: Billy Roy Boyd
Respondent: Donnie Stonebreaker
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Pimentel v. Plyler et al
as 2:2019cv03035
Plaintiff: Robert Samuel Pimentel
Defendant: Town of Mount Pleasant, The, South Carolina Municipal Insurance and Risk Financing Fund, Craig Harris and others
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Pinckney v. U.S. Government - IRS et al
as 2:2019cv03046
Defendant: Prosecutor Randolf Murdock, U.S. Government - IRS, Judge Luke Brown
Plaintiff: Henry Lee Pinckney
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?