District of South Carolina Prisoner Petitions Cases

Cases filed


Cases 61 - 70 of 19,819
Hatfield v. Inabinet et al
as 8:2019cv00235
Defendant: Sgt Natasha Rivers, Lt Ellen Inabinet
Plaintiff: Mark Hatfield
Cause Of Action: (Other)
Ward v. Joyner
as 2:2019cv00244
Respondent: Warden Hector Joyner
Petitioner: Frederick Lamar Ward
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
English v. South Carolina Department of Corrections et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2019cv00246
Plaintiff: Roderick English, Ralph K.
Defendant: US Marshal Justice Marshal Blackmun, Attorney General Donald Zelenka, South Carolina Department of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: Civil Rights Act
Majeed v. USA
as 3:2019cv00241
Respondent: USA
Petitioner: Raheem Majeed
Cause Of Action: Motion to Vacate Sentence
Norris v. Sterlin et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2019cv00245
Defendant: Director Brian Sterlin, Major Mr. Ray, Warden Mr. Joyner
Plaintiff: Garron LaDon Norris
Cause Of Action: Civil Rights Act
Broughton v. State of South Carolina et al
as 4:2019cv00220
Respondent: State of South Carolina, Charleston County Jail
Petitioner: Bryan J. Broughton
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Shellman et al
as 4:2019cv00226
Petitioner: Joseph Henry Shellman, Jr.
Respondent: Acting Warden W. Vereen
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Abebe v. USA
as 3:2019cv00242
Respondent: USA
Petitioner: Unula Boo Shawn Abebe
Cause Of Action: Motion to Vacate Sentence
Brown v. Williams
as 0:2019cv00228
Respondent: Charles Williams
Petitioner: Tequan L. Brown
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Singletary v. Stephon et al
as 9:2019cv00227
Respondent: Borad River Correctional, Warden Michael Stephon
Petitioner: Robert Singletary
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?