District of South Dakota Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases filed
Cases 1 - 10 of 1,645
Gonsalez-Campos v. United States of America
as 4:2017cv04127
Plaintiff:
Christy Dawn Gonsalez-Campos
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Cochrin v. Dooley
as 5:2017cv05071
Petitioner:
Larry Cochrin
Defendant:
Robert B. Dooley
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Weibel v. United States of America
as 5:2017cv05072
Plaintiff:
Nathaniel Johnross Weibel
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Palomarez v. Young et al
as 5:2017cv05070
Petitioner:
Alexander Schroder Palomarez
Respondent:
Darin Young, Marty Jackley
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Nelson v. Gilbertson et al
as 3:2017cv03023
Plaintiff:
Franklin Sandoval Nelson
Defendant:
David E. Gilbertson, Glen A. Severson, Steven L. Zinter
and others
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Shaw v. Kaemingk et al
as 4:2017cv04116
Plaintiff:
James Elmer Shaw
Defendant:
Dennis Kaemingk, Robert Dooley, Darin Young
and others
Cause Of Action: Civil Rights Act - Civil Action for Deprivation of Rights
Pratt v. People of the State of South Dakota
as 4:2017cv04115
Petitioner:
Robert Merle Pratt
Respondent:
People of the State of South Dakota
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Allen v. Warden Federal Prison Camp Yankton
as 4:2017cv04114
Petitioner:
Doug Allen
Respondent:
Warden Federal Prison Camp Yankton
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Brakeall v. Dooley
as 4:2017cv04112
Petitioner:
Winston Grey Brakeall
Respondent:
Robert Dooley
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Palomarez v. Young et al
as 5:2017cv05062
Plaintiff:
Alexander Schroder Palomarez
Defendant:
Darin Young, Rotor, United States District Court
and others
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
