South Dakota Other Statutes Cases
Cases 41 - 50 of 190
Tripp v. Federal Government of the U.S.A. et al
as 4:2019cv04071
Defendant:
Federal Government of the U.S.A. and Matthew W. Thelen
Plaintiff:
Kevin Christopher Micheal Tripp
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Eagleton v. Berryhill
as 5:2019cv05010
Plaintiff:
Susan M. Eagleton
Defendant:
Nancy A. Berryhill
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Creek v. Weber et al
as 4:2017cv04159
Plaintiff:
Clayton Sheldon Creek
Defendant:
Douglas Weber and Dennis Kaemingk
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Stowell v. Credico, Inc.
as 4:2017cv04144
Plaintiff:
Eric Stowell
Defendant:
Credico, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Boen & Associates, Inc. v. HM LLC et al
as 4:2017cv04118
Plaintiff:
Boen & Associates, Inc.
Defendant:
HM LLC, William J. Rezac, Jo Lynn Higgins and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1836
Frazier v. Bureau of Indian Affairs- Cheyenne River Agency
as 3:2017cv03020
Plaintiff:
Harold Frazier
Defendant:
Bureau of Indian Affairs- Cheyenne River Agency
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Tri-County Water Association, Inc. v. City of Eagle Butte
as 3:2017cv03018
Plaintiff:
Tri-County Water Association, Inc.
Defendant:
City of Eagle Butte
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sterling Computers Corporation v. Haskell
as 4:2017cv04073
Plaintiff:
Sterling Computers Corporation
Defendant:
Julie Haskell
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1836
Baker v. Phillips et al
as 5:2017cv05024
Plaintiff:
William Ray Baker
Defendant:
Brent Phillips, Lia Green, John Pierce and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
POET, LLC et al v. Nelson Engineering, Inc. et al
as 4:2017cv04029
Plaintiff:
POET, LLC and POET Research, Inc.
Defendant:
Nelson Engineering, Inc. and Jerry Baker
Counter_claimant:
Jerry Baker and Nelson Engineering, Inc.
Counter_defendant:
POET Research, Inc. and POET, LLC
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1836
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
