South Dakota Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 61 - 70 of 2,417
McKinney v. FPC Yankton et al
as 4:2023cv04188
Petitioner:
Brad McKinney
Respondent:
FPC Yankton, Officer C. Wells, Visor and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Black Moon v. Rowher et al
as 4:2023cv04187
Plaintiff:
David Micah Black Moon
Defendant:
Sgt Rowher and Yost
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv04182
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Babcock v. Fluke et al
as 5:2023cv05076
Petitioner:
Kevin Babcock
Respondent:
Brent Fluke and Marty Jackley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Grady v. Fluke et al
as 5:2023cv05075
Petitioner:
Adam Owen Grady
Respondent:
Warden Brent Fluke and The Attorney General of the State of South Dakota
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Two Hearts v. United States of America
as 3:2023cv03027
Plaintiff:
Chad Two Hearts
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Graf v. Lincoln County et al
as 4:2023cv04172
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Daniel Graf
Defendant:
Lincoln County, Kellie Wasko, Brent Fluke and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Knode v. Fredrikson et al
as 4:2023cv04171
Plaintiff:
Andrew Dwight Knode
Defendant:
Tracy Fredrikson, Doug Clark, Mark Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv03028
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Graf v. Fluke et al
as 4:2023cv04173
Petitioner:
Nicholas Daniel Graf
Respondent:
Warden Brent Fluke and Marty Jackley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
