South Dakota Labor Cases
Cases 21 - 30 of 36
Richardson v. Hobbs
as 5:2010cv05050
Plaintiff:
Amanda Richardson
Defendant:
William Hobbs
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 203
Brown v. Darren Nelson Trucking, Inc.
as 4:2010cv04029
Plaintiff:
Marlys J. Brown
Defendant:
Darren Nelson Trucking, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
Nolz v. Muscular Dystrophy Association, Inc.
as 4:2009cv04193
Plaintiff:
Merri Nolz
Defendant:
Muscular Dystrophy Association, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
Large v. Waste Management Inc. et al
as 5:2009cv05091
Plaintiff:
Bryan Large
Defendant:
Waste Management Inc. and Waste Management of South Dakota, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
VanLaar v. McGowan
as 4:2009cv04126
Plaintiff:
Lynn VanLaar
Defendant:
Michael McGowan, LLC and Michael McGowan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
Specht et al v. The City of Sioux Falls
as 4:2008cv04124
Plaintiff:
Micheal Specht, Mark Donelan, Mark Egger and others
Defendant:
The City of Sioux Falls
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Houg v. Builders Management & Investment Co., Inc.
as 4:2008cv04112
Plaintiff:
Lucille A. Houg and Lucille A. Houg
Defendant:
Builders Management & Investment Co., Inc.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Peck v. Diamond Post and Steel Buildings, Inc.
as 5:2008cv05052
Plaintiff:
Bruce Peck and Scott Paramo
Defendant:
Diamond Post Steel Buildings, Inc., Dan Erskin and Duane A. Nicholas
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Smoot v. C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc.
as 4:2007cv04038
Plaintiff:
Angela K. Smoot
Defendant:
C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Ernesti v. City of Sioux Falls, South Dakota
as 4:2006cv04252
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
