US District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee Other Statutes Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 55
Merelles v. CBL & Associates Properties, Inc. et al (JRG1)
as 1:2019cv00193
Defendant:
Stephen D. Lebovitz, A. Larry Chapman, Farzana Khaleel and others
Plaintiff:
Alberto Merelles
Petitioner:
Jay Scolnick, Mark Shaner, Jeff Lion and others
Williams v. CBL & Associates Properties, Inc. et al (JRG1)
as 1:2019cv00181
Defendant:
Stephen D. Lebovitz, A. Larry Chapman, Farzana Khaleel and others
Plaintiff:
Patrick Williams
Petitioner:
Jay Scolnick, Mark Shaner, Jeff Lion and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Paskowitz v. CBL & Associates Properties, Inc. et al (JRG1)
as 1:2019cv00149
Defendant:
STEPHEN D. LEBOVITZ, FARZANA KHALEEL, CHARLES B. LEBOVITZ and others
Plaintiff:
LAURENCE PASKOWITZ
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77
Stein v. U.S. Xpress Enterprises, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv00098
Defendant:
Max Fuller, US XPRESS ENTERPRISES, INC., Jason Grear and others
Plaintiff:
LEWIS STEIN, Charles Clowdis and Bryan K. Robbins
Petitioner:
Excavators Union Local 731 Pension Fund and Deirdre Terry
Intervenor Plaintiff:
CARLOS GARCIA and USX INVESTOR GROUP
City of Taylor General Employees Retirement System v. Astec Industries, Inc. et al (PLR1)
as 1:2019cv00024
Defendant:
David C. Silvious, Benjamin G. Brock and Astec Industries, Inc.
Plaintiff:
City of Taylor General Employees Retirement System
City of Taylor Police and Fire Retirement System v. UNUM Group et al (TV1)
as 1:2018cv00169
Defendant:
UNUM Group, Daniel J. Waxenberg, Steve Zabel and others
Plaintiff:
City of Taylor Police and Fire Retirement System
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Pittman v. Unum Group et al (TV3)
as 1:2018cv00128
Defendant:
Unum Group, Richard P. McKenney, John F. McGarry and others
Plaintiff:
Cynthia Pittman
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv00090
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.