US District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee Civil Rights Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 52
Gragert v. Walters Ridge Apartments, L.P. (TV1)
as 2:2018cv00175
Defendant:
Walters Ridge Apartments, L.P.
Plaintiff:
Judy Gragert
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Weatherly et al v. Janice et al (JRG2)
as 2:2018cv00167
Plaintiff:
Calvin Edward Weatherly and Willie Robert Weatherly
Defendant:
Warren M. Hilton and Janice Hilton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Nickell v. The Metropolitan et al
as 3:2018cv00088
Plaintiff:
David Leon Nickell
Defendant:
The Metropolitan and Christina Osborne
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Howard et al (RLJ2)
as 3:2017cv00322
Plaintiff:
Audrey Howard , Carl Gann , Emma McDaniel and others
Defendant:
Land End Investors Trust, Lea Satterfield and Wilma Watson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Williams et al v. Wright et al (PLR2)
as 1:2016cv00471
Plaintiff:
Charles D Williams and Barbara K Williams
Defendant:
Janice Wright and Donald Burton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Bright v. Wilson et al
as 4:2016cv00051
Plaintiff:
Edna Bright
Defendant:
Mary Wilson, Tennessee Housing Development Agency, Ted Fellman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bright v. Sitting et al
as 4:2016cv00053
Plaintiff:
Edna Bright
Defendant:
Ben Cantrell, Karin Hammelehel Toves, Nathan Hunt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bright v. Sitting et al
as 1:2016mc00039
Plaintiff:
Edna Bright
Defendant:
Ben Cantrell, Karin Hammelehel Toves, Nathan Hunt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bright v. Braden et al
as 4:2016cv00055
Plaintiff:
Edna B Bright
Defendant:
Paul Braden, Kelsie Jones and Mark Aaron
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Clemens et al v. Yes Communities, LLC et al
as 1:2015cv00306
Defendant:
Yes Communities, LLC , Ponderosa Pines of Ooltewah, Tennessee and Brian Simac
Plaintiff:
Laura Clemens and Kristi Turner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
