US District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 51 - 60 of 6,280
Thomas v. Maguinuss et al
as 4:2024cv00015
Plaintiff:
Timothy D. Thomas
Defendant:
Evon Maguinuss, Liz Hodge, Jackie Matheny, Jr and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Adkins v. Dickerson
as 3:2024cv00066
Petitioner:
Jessica R Adkins
Respondent:
Stanley Dickerson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Goodwin v. State of Tennessee et al
as 1:2024cv00061
Plaintiff:
Edgar Goodwin
Defendant:
State of Tennessee, Shian, Kitchen Staff and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lacy v. Pounds
as 2:2024cv00022
Petitioner:
Anthony Lacy
Respondent:
Zac Pounds
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Brown v. State of Tennessee
as 1:2024cv00065
Plaintiff:
Wiltha Z Brown
Defendant:
State of Tennessee, Kasha Brown and Demetrius Brown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rayfield v. Bradley County, Tennessee
as 1:2024cv00056
Plaintiff:
Ryan Lee Rayfield
Defendant:
Bradley County, Tennessee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Moore v. Leeds
as 3:2024cv00051
Petitioner:
Corey Lee Moore
Respondent:
Warden Chance Leeds
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Penley v. Smith et al
as 2:2024cv00021
Plaintiff:
Cody Penley
Defendant:
Ronnie Lawson, Butch Gallion, Sharon Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Spence v. Hamilton County, Tennessee et al
as 1:2024cv00054
Plaintiff:
Ronald Wesley Spence, Jr.
Defendant:
Hamilton County, Tennessee, Austin Garrett, Cerion Carson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Crayton v. USA
as 1:2024cv00050
Petitioner:
Demonte Crayton
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
