US District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee Intellectual Property Cases
Cases 101 - 110 of 316
Griffin Technology, LLC v. Cyber Power Systems (USA), Inc.
as 3:2017cv00141
Plaintiff:
Griffin Technology, LLC
Defendant:
Cyber Power Systems (USA), Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051
Shabby Apple, LLC v. Loftis et al
as 2:2016cv00108
Plaintiff:
Shabby Apple, LLC
Defendant:
Melissa Loftis and Kelsie McClain
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
Primanti Bros. Restaurant Corporation v. Almost Famous Saloon, LLC
as 3:2016cv03046
Plaintiff:
Primanti Bros. Restaurant Corporation
Defendant:
Almost Famous Saloon, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051
Arbonne International, LLC v. Pieratt
as 3:2016cv03020
Plaintiff:
Arbonne International, LLC
Defendant:
Heidi Pieratt
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
Encore Furniture Thrifts And More, LLC v. Doubletap, Inc
as 3:2016cv02846
Plaintiff:
Encore Furniture Thrifts And More, LLC
Defendant:
Doubletap, Inc
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051
The Procter & Gamble Company v. Vi-Jon, Inc.
as 3:2016cv02807
Plaintiff:
The Procter & Gamble Company
Defendant:
Vi-Jon, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Fox Moving & Storage of Tennessee, LLC v. Fox Moving & Storage
as 3:2016cv02492
Plaintiff:
Fox Moving & Storage of Tennessee, LLC
Defendant:
Fox Moving & Storage
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
The Breakout Games LLC v. Breakout Plan, LLC
as 3:2016cv02257
Plaintiff:
The Breakout Games LLC
Defendant:
Breakout Plan, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
Harpeth Financial Services, LLC v. The Lakeland Group, Inc.
as 3:2016cv00888
Plaintiff:
Harpeth Financial Services, LLC
Defendant:
The Lakeland Group, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Clyde's Restaurant Group, Inc. v. MF Restaurant Group, LLC
as 3:2016cv00885
Plaintiff:
Clyde's Restaurant Group, Inc.
Defendant:
MF Restaurant Group, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
