US District Court for the Western District of Tennessee Prisoner Petitions Cases

Cases filed
Cases 101 - 110 of 6,595
Dowell v. Kent et al
as 1:2022cv01009
Plaintiff: Kelvin Dowell
Defendant: FNU Kent, FNU Bo, Mark Fowler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Clancy v. United States of America
as 2:2022cv02012
Plaintiff: Lamar Clancy
Defendant: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Wade v. Mehr et al
as 1:2022cv01006
Plaintiff: Max R. Wade
Defendant: John Mehr, Scott Conger and Madison County Government Official
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williamson v. Mehr et al
as 1:2022cv01007
Plaintiff: William Williamson
Defendant: Sheriff John Mehr, Mayor Scott Conger and Madison County Government Official
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brent v. Vantell
as 1:2022cv01005
Petitioner: John Brent
Respondent: Vinnie Vantell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Brown v. United States of America et al
as 2:2021cv02821
Plaintiff: Chalmers Brown
Defendant: United States of America and FBOP Department of Justice
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Cunningham v. Paris We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2021cv02809
Petitioner: Derek Cunningham, II
Respondent: Michael Paris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Taylor v. Hall
as 2:2021cv02806
Petitioner: Tommy Taylor
Respondent: Warden Hilton Hall, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Hart v. Chester County Tennessee et al
as 1:2021cv01212
Defendant: Kyle Carter, Chester County Tennessee, Chester County Sheriff's Department and others
Plaintiff: Gary Lynn Hart
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sewell v. State of Tennessee
as 2:2021cv02799
Petitioner: Glenn Sewell
Respondent: State of Tennessee and Warden Vincent Vantell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?