Tennessee Civil Rights Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 18,575
Russell v. Scott et al
as 1:2025cv01100
Plaintiff:
Danny Russell
Defendant:
Frankie Scott, Blake Jenkins, Miranda Garner and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2025cv00437
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Roe et al v. Rutherford County Board of Education et al
as 3:2025cv00429
Plaintiff:
Rachel Roe, David Doe, Claire Coe and others
Defendant:
Rutherford County Board of Education and James Sullivan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2025cv00421
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Morris v. Direct Express Payment Processing Service et al
as 1:2025cv00126
Plaintiff:
Charles K Morris
Defendant:
Direct Express Payment Processing Service and Comerica Bank
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Wardlow v. Child Support Services
as 3:2025cv00152
Plaintiff:
Bill Wardlow
Defendant:
Child Support Services
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241 Conspiracy Against Rights
Williams v. Loudon County Sheriff's Office et al
as 3:2025cv00155
Plaintiff:
Travis B Williams
Defendant:
Loudon County Sheriff's Office, Jeff Harris, Jimmy Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Wood v. Partain
as 1:2025cv01099
Plaintiff:
Ricky L. Wood
Defendant:
Hunter Partain
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2025cv02413
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Adamson v. Horwitz et al
as 3:2025cv00420
Plaintiff:
Trevor S. Adamson
Defendant:
Daniel A. Horwitz, Melissa K. Dix, Sarah L. Martin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
