Tennessee Civil Rights Cases
Cases 21 - 30 of 8,177
Race et al v. Wear et al
as 2:2025cv00007
Defendant:
City of Pigeon Forge and David Wear
Plaintiff:
Doug Race and Mika Race
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Race et al v. City of Pigeon Forge et al
as 2:2025cv00011
Plaintiff:
Mika Race and Doug Race
Defendant:
David Wear and City of Pigeon Forge
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
McCurry v. Tennessee Court of Appeals et al
as 2:2025cv00012
Defendant:
W Neal McBrayer, J Steven Stafford, Carma Dennis McGee and others
Plaintiff:
Agness McCurry
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hawkins v. Lylod et al
as 3:2025cv00051
Defendant:
Curry Brasfiend, Pastor f/n/u Lylod, Pastor Ron Caparter, Jr. and others
Plaintiff:
Leon Hawkins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hawkins v. Bond et al
as 3:2025cv00053
Defendant:
Milan Police, Martin Police, Judge f/n/u Bond and others
Plaintiff:
Leon Hawkins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hawkins v. Moore et al
as 3:2025cv00054
Defendant:
Milan Box, Dresden Police Dept, MTD Plant and others
Plaintiff:
Leon Hawkins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hawkins v. Bond
as 3:2025cv00055
Plaintiff:
Leon Hawkins
Defendant:
Judge f/n/u Bond
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
American Alliance for Equal Rights v. McDonald's Corporation et al
as 3:2025cv00050
Defendant:
McDonald's Corporation, McDonald's USA, LLC and International Scholarship and Tuition Services, Inc.
Plaintiff:
American Alliance for Equal Rights
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Doe v. Hamilton County Department of Education
as 1:2025cv00010
Defendant:
Hamilton County Department of Education
Plaintiff:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Doe v. Hamilton County Department of Education
as 1:2025cv00011
Defendant:
Hamilton County Department of Education
Plaintiff:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
