Tennessee Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 41 - 50 of 24,461
Gilbert v. Phillips et al
as 3:2024cv00442
Plaintiff:
Corey Demoris Gilbert
Defendant:
Amber L. Phillips and John Doe #1
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Churchwell v. Phillips et al
as 3:2024cv00443
Plaintiff:
Lavonta Churchwell
Defendant:
Amber L. Phillips and John Doe #1
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Washington v. State of Tennessee et al
as 1:2024cv00146
Plaintiff:
Angelos Washington
Defendant:
State of Tennessee, The, Tennessee Department of Correction, Bledsoe County Correction Complex and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cobb v. Phillips et al
as 3:2024cv00424
Plaintiff:
Roderick D. Cobb
Defendant:
Amber L. Phillips and John Doe #1
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Peoples v. Phillips et al
as 3:2024cv00432
Plaintiff:
Rivera Latroy Peoples
Defendant:
Amber L. Phillips and John Doe #1
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Boyd v. Phillips et al
as 3:2024cv00425
Plaintiff:
Alvertis Boyd
Defendant:
Amber L. Phillips and John Doe #1
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Henneberg v. Phillips et al
as 3:2024cv00433
Plaintiff:
Brian Henneberg
Defendant:
Amber L. Phillips and John Doe #1
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Arnold v. Phillips et al
as 3:2024cv00434
Plaintiff:
Antonio Arnold
Defendant:
Amber L. Phillips and John Doe #1
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Phillips et al
as 3:2024cv00435
Plaintiff:
Marty D. Williams
Defendant:
Amber L. Phillips and John Doe #1
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ellis v. Phillips et al
as 3:2024cv00436
Plaintiff:
Ronald P. Ellis
Defendant:
Amber L. Phillips and John Doe #1
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
