District Court Cases in Tennessee
Cases 61 - 70 of 88,513
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00459
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00462
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
New Muslim Party v. State of Tennessee
as 3:2024cv00458
Plaintiff:
New Muslim Party
Defendant:
State of Tennessee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Barber v. Coggins et al
as 3:2024cv00174
Plaintiff:
Jessica Barber
Defendant:
Brandon Coggins, GSP Transportation, Inc. and UM Geico Insurance
Cause Of Action: 23 U.S.C. § 134 P.I.- Auto Negligence
Taylor v. 3M Company et al
as 3:2024cv00172
Plaintiff:
Barbara Taylor
Defendant:
3M Company and Arizant Healthcare, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Colbaugh v. Meigs County et al
as 1:2024cv00151
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Andrew Colbaugh
Defendant:
Meigs County, Meigs County Sheriff's Department, Robert Leonard and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00175
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12117 Americans with Disabilities Act
Harris v. Greyhound Lines, Inc.
as 2:2024cv02234
Plaintiff:
James Harris
Defendant:
Greyhound Lines, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Moore v. Watwood et al
as 1:2024cv01085
Plaintiff:
Michael Shane Moore
Defendant:
Brandon Watwood, Frank Strata, Jon Walton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sandlin v. United States of America
as 2:2024cv02233
Plaintiff:
Joshua Sandlin
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7422 IRS: Refund Taxes
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
