US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 9,490
Williams v. Director, TDCJ
as 6:2024cv00429
Petitioner:
DeJuan A Williams
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Sims v. Sheriff-Shelby County
as 9:2024cv00215
Respondent:
Sheriff-Shelby County
Petitioner:
Tammy Sue Sims
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Medrano v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 6:2024cv00428
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Petitioner:
Arturo S. Medrano
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 s Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Sanchez v. Warden, FCI Beaumont Medium
as 1:2024cv00457
Petitioner:
Rolan Sanchez
Respondent:
Warden, FCI Beaumont Medium
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Mays v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 1:2024cv00456
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Petitioner:
Sammie Mays
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hutt v. Carter
as 1:2024cv00444
Petitioner:
Devontay Jerrod Hutt
Respondent:
Warden T Carter
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Talley v. TDCJ
as 2:2024cv00882
Defendant:
TDCJ
Plaintiff:
William Michael Talley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Smith v. TDCJ
as 2:2024cv00883
Petitioner:
Prentis Earl Smith, II
Respondent:
TDCJ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Estrada, Jr. v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 1:2024cv00442
Petitioner:
Joe Salinas Estrada, Jr.
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hernandez-Silva v. Enge
as 6:2024cv00415
Petitioner:
Jose Hernandez-Silva
Respondent:
Unknown Enge
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
