US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 21 - 30 of 9,325
Kindred v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 1:2024cv00122
Petitioner:
Herman Lee Kindred
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Green v. Warden, USP Canaan
as 1:2024cv00131
Petitioner:
Reginald Edward Green
Respondent:
Warden, USP Canaan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 s Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Endsley v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 6:2024cv00125
Petitioner:
Anthony Endsley
Defendant:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 s Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Clark v. Lumpkin
as 1:2024cv00118
Petitioner:
Herbert Charles Clark
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Carr v. TDCJ-CID
as 2:2024cv00213
Petitioner:
Willie Ty'rone Carr
Defendant:
Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Garcia v. Disciplinary Department
as 6:2024cv00111
Petitioner:
Antonio Andres Garcia
Respondent:
Disciplinary Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Brown v. Warden
as 5:2024cv00043
Petitioner:
Jerry Ray Brown
Respondent:
FCI Texarkana Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Duvall v. Gregg County Sheriff
as 6:2024cv00115
Petitioner:
Steven Lee Duvall
Respondent:
Gregg County Sheriff
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Solomon v. Sheriff, Jefferson County
as 1:2024cv00109
Petitioner:
Surafel H. Solomon
Respondent:
Sheriff, Jefferson County
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 s Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ramirez v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 4:2024cv00263
Petitioner:
Ricardo Ramirez
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
