US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 81 - 90 of 9,321
Sills v. Warden
as 5:2024cv00005
Petitioner:
Robert Sills
Respondent:
FCI Texarkana Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Miller v. Sheriff - Shelby County Jail
as 9:2024cv00008
Petitioner:
Dalton Grant Miller
Respondent:
Sheriff - Shelby County Jail
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Owens v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 4:2024cv00023
Plaintiff:
Donald W Owens
Defendant:
Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Polk v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 1:2024cv00011
Petitioner:
James Lee Polk
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Duvall v. Gregg County Sheriff
as 6:2024cv00009
Petitioner:
Steven Lee Duvall
Respondent:
State Of Texas and Gregg County Sheriff
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Solano v. Director, TDCJ
as 6:2024cv00007
Petitioner:
Jairo Francisco Solano
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Weatherly v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 9:2024cv00005
Petitioner:
Rohn M Weatherly
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
White v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 6:2024cv00002
Petitioner:
Anthony Scott White
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Smith v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 5:2024cv00003
Plaintiff:
Rickey W. Smith
Defendant:
Jerry Rochelle, Darren Anderson and Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
White v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 5:2024cv00007
Petitioner:
Anthony Scott White
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
